2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. According to Article 2 of the Control of Livestock and Fish Feed Act, the term "short-use feed" means plant, animal, or mineral substances used directly as feed or as raw materials for mixed feed, which are determined and publicly announced by the Minister of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, using fish by-products, etc. from 21, 93-ro, Busan, Seo-gu, Busan, and 93-ro.

On March 2, 2009, the Defendant completed the registration of the single-use feed manufacturing business by designating the production feed type as “short-use feed (including ingredients registration: other animal single-use feed).”

(2) Article 6 of the former Enforcement Rule of the Control of Livestock and Fish Feed Act (wholly amended by Ordinance of the Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries No. 64, Mar. 20, 2009) provides that the Minister of Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries may exclude heating facilities from the Plaintiff’s primary feed manufacturing facilities in accordance with attached Table 3 of Article 6 of the former Enforcement Rule of the Control of Livestock and Fish Feed Act.

B. On June 11, 2009, the amendment of the Enforcement Rule of the Control of Livestock and Fish Feed Act (wholly amended by Ordinance of the Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries No. 64 of March 2009) (wholly amended by Ordinance of the Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries) (amended by Ordinance No. 64 of March 20, 209), the Plaintiff is producing the processed products and by-products of fish.

The change was made to the court.

C. The Plaintiff produced feed without installing heat treatment facilities such as facilities. According to the relevant provisions, such as the Enforcement Rule of the Control of Livestock and Fish Feed Act, the Defendant, as amended, ordered the Plaintiff to install a facility to order the Plaintiff to install a feed production facility suitable for the relevant provisions, such as the Control of Livestock and Fish Feed Act, on the ground that the Plaintiff violated the provision, although the feed of single-undeveloped feed should be treated by heat treatment in a certain way, but the Plaintiff violated the provision.

The plaintiff as above.