(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.09.24 2019고단3003
도로법위반
Text
The defendant is innocent.
Reasons
1. A violation against the restriction on vehicle operation conducted on the street above the Seogsan Business Office at a point of 18 kilometers in the Southern Sea Highway around June 1, 2001 by an employee of the accused specified in the facts charged;
2. Since the penal provisions applied to a summary order subject to review have retroactively lost effect according to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality, the Defendant is acquitted in accordance with the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.
참조조문