2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff is an owner of 2,608С E in Gangseo-si (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s land”).

B. The Defendant is the owner of C paddy-gu, C, 241 square meters and D 2,608 square meters (hereinafter “Defendant’s land”) adjacent to the Plaintiff’s land.

C. The Plaintiff’s land can only be a contribution through the Defendant’s land or a forest of 18,050 square meters adjacent to the Defendant’s land (hereinafter “instant forest”).

Attached Form

감정도(2) 표시 1, 24, 25, 7, 1의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 (가)부분 13㎡(이하 ‘이 사건 ㈎부분 토지‘라 한다)와 같은 도면 표시 7, 8, 9, 27, 26, 25, 7의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 (나)부분(이하 ’이 사건 ㈏부분 토지‘라 한다)과 인접한 이 사건 임야에는 원고의 토지로 통행할 수 있는 포장되지 않은 통행로(산길)가 있다.

E. The Defendant cultivated dry field crops, such as shoulder and spash, from the Defendant’s land, and installed water nets, etc. on the boundary line connecting each point of 1,7,8, and9 of the same drawings.

F. The Plaintiff is growing shoulder in the Plaintiff’s land.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy Facts, entries and images of evidence A1 and 3 (including paper numbers), the result of the on-site inspection by this Court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. 원고의 주장 원고의 토지로 트랙터가 통행하기 위하여는 최소 3m 폭의 통행로가 필요하고, 피고의 토지 중 폭 3m의 통행로에 해당하는 이 사건 ㈎, ㈏부분 토지를 통하지 않고서는 공로로 통행할 수 없으므로, 피고에 대하여 이 사건 ㈎, ㈏부분 토지에 관한 통행권 확인과 통행방해 금지 등을 구한다.

3. Determination as follows: The right of passage over surrounding land stipulated in Article 219 of the Civil Code is particularly recognized at the risk of damage to the owner of the land under way for the public interest, which is the use of land without a passage necessary for its use between the public interest and the public interest. Thus, the width or location of the passage road shall be considered.