If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On December 29, 2017, from around 12:30 to 13:15 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force for about 40 minutes, by: (a) the Defendant’s “D cafeteria” in the victim C’s operation from around 12:30 on December 29, 2017 to around 13:15 on the same day; and (b) as a result of calculating the value of the victim’s and the tenant’s share, “A 200s” was expressed as “A 20s,” and preventing the Defendant from being exposed to a disturbance, such as a shot of the customer who had drinking in the next place of drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;