beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.11.26 2014고단2314

사행행위등규제및처벌특례법위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 21, 2011, the Defendant sentenced the Daejeon District Court to one year for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on August 30, 2012.

From April 26, 2014 to May 2, 2014, the Defendant installed 80 games in the “F Gameland,” which are located on the first floor of the Daejeon metropolitan E-gu, Daejeon, and had many unspecified customers who visited the game take cash into the game machine and began the game, the Defendant had them do the game by obtaining specific points according to the appearance of automatic playing function, example and chainal function, and then let customers exchange the points that they acquired through the game in cash. The Defendant operated the speculative act using the speculative gaming machine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness G and H;

1. A game product appraisal report;

1. Each investigation report (fields of control) (investigation into the exchange slips);

1. Copies of money exchange slips, and copies of business account books;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Previous convictions: Criminal history records, investigation reports, and judgment on the defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel asserted to the effect that the instant game only operated the deliberation machine called “marine extension” in the instant game, and that they did not provide or exchange the marine camping game to customers.

2. The evidence presented by the prosecutor, in particular, the witness G was an employee in the game of this case. G had been working in the game where the marine camping game was offered before the game of this case. However, the game of this case was stated that the same game of this case was operated and provided, and the witness H who conducted the appraisal of the game of this case had shown that the specific program related to the marine camping at the game of this case had been carried out.