However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 2, 2014, at around 08:00, the Defendant: (a) damaged the “D” store operated by the victim C in the Won-si, the Defendant, using a hurf (41cm, 21cm in length on the day) which is a dangerous object, and using a hurf (23,400cm in total in the market price owned by the victim).

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous things and damaged the property owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of criminal implements;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, Article 366 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., reflectiveness, agreement, etc.);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary Mitigation);

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;