When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Defendant did not have any special occupation or income, and even if they purchased goods on credit with bad credit standing, they could not pay the price, and even if they borrowed money from others, they did not have any intent or ability to pay the price.

Nevertheless, around September 28, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the D pharmacy operated by the victim C, saying, “I would transfer the drug value to sponsoring; (b) as if I would pay the drug value; and (c) was issued by the injured party with a drug equivalent to KRW 200,000,000 from the market value from around 30 times until May 28, 2014, the Defendant purchased drugs on credit equivalent to KRW 1.550,00 won in total from the injured party, or received an amount between KRW 50,000,000 won and KRW 1,000 won at one time under the pretext of teaching expenses, meal expenses, transportation expenses, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement 1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the accusation and loan certificate to C:

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;