2. Determination was made by the Defendant several times from around 2012 to March 2016. However, the instant crime was committed around July 2013. The Defendant is currently not engaged in a heavy trading business related to the instant crime, and other various sentencing conditions specified in the instant argument, including the background of the instant crime, the circumstances after the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, and environment, are not deemed unfair, given that the lower court’s punishment is too uneasible and unfair. Accordingly, the Prosecutor’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.