If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On January 8, 2018, the Defendant: (a) 21:10, around 21:10, had two infinite customers in the D cafeteria operated by the Victim C (V, 65 years of age) in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu; (b) “The Defendant was unable to perform funeral services at the nearest place of this weather, but she was aware of the cafeteria; and (c) caused me to a cafeteria by any gue fraud; and (d) died from the aging of the Asia in the same year;

If the same nature is equal, it will be good to open a quid pro quo, the aged and her bit of bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (a written statement) and a report on investigation (or an investigation by a witness E);

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of insult) and the selection of each fine concerning the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act include the fact that the victim wants to be punished strictly, and the defendant's age, sex, environment, relationship with the victim, motive and consequence of the crime, and circumstances revealed in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances revealed in the arguments of this case, shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the punishment as ordered.