If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On September 30, 2012, the Defendant, at around 09:30 on September 30, 2012, had been in contact with the victim C (the age of 43) in the vicinity of the Chuncheon Park Park Park, which caused the damage to the victim C by plaling, plaling, and plaling the victim C’s hand by setting up against the Defendant’s breath, and plaling the dispute, the victim C’s son’s son’s son (the age of 17)’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son who is in need of treatment for about 14 days

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D, E, and C;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The written statement of the defendant;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Determination as to the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion of the victim's photographic photo, victim's DNA photographic photo, suspect C motion picture on the victim C

1. There is no injury to the victims of the arguments, and even if the injury was inflicted on the victims of domestic affairs, it is inevitable to resist the victims' passive resistance during the victim's act of injury. Thus, the defendant's act is justified as it constitutes self-defense or legitimate act.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, namely, the victim C and D, are consistent from the investigative agency to this court, and consistently, as indicated in the criminal facts in the judgment of the defendant, and the victim C and D were able to pluck up and pluck up the victim C’s hand, and the victim D’s stroke injury was inflicted upon him, and the circumstances leading up to the end of the instant case, the Defendant’s specific statement and behavior, etc. are credibility.