However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. At around 01:40 on March 8, 2015, the Defendant interfered with business, without any justifiable reason, obstructed the victim’s restaurant work by having the customers drinking food on the side table table with drinking water, throwing the eng-scopic scopic scopic scopic scops on the floor, leaving the eng-scopic scopic scopic scopic scops on the floor, and neglecting the victim’s restaurant work.

2. The charges of injury and obstruction of the performance of official duties are also stated in the facts that the defendant took a bath, but the prosecutor did not prosecute the facts as a crime of insult, and the defendant cannot be prosecuted to the effect that he threatened the public official performing his duties. As such, the part of the charges of obstruction of the performance of official duties (the part of assault against the public official performing his duties) among the charges, shall be summarized as follows, and criminal facts shall be acknowledged.

The Defendant, at the same time and place as Paragraph 1, was reported to the victim by 112, who was dispatched, and the F (F. 26 years of age) belonging to the police station E-district in the police station, was used to pay food value to the Defendant and return home to the Defendant, and the Defendant, by hand, assaulted a police official performing legitimate duties in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of a crime, and at the same time, inflicted an injury on the left side of the inside part requiring medical treatment for about one week to F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of the legislation in its opinion;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is the order to attend lectures and the order to provide community service.