beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.12.22 2016노1863

위증

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (four months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The confession after the final and conclusive judgment of the relevant case does not constitute a requisite reduction or exemption under the Criminal Act, since the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes at the latest and reflected.

The fact that there is no criminal punishment exceeding the fine is favorable to the defendant.

However, the crime of this case is a serious crime that interferes with the trial of the court for the discovery of substantial truth and thus causes confusion and incompetence in the judicial action of the State, which requires a strict punishment. In fact, the defendant's perjury was pronounced not guilty in the first instance court of the related case due to the defendant's perjury, and other various circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and trial process, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the defendant's argument is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.