However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On April 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 20:50, at the E store operated by the victim D located in Jungdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant: (b) placed four bread in a breath in a breath in a breath in a breath, by inserting four breath in a breath, and demanded that the victim “breath in a breath in a breath,” which did not open the breath to the breath, the instant 4 breath in a breath, and obstructed the victim’s tasks by force until the police officer called upon receipt of a report, by means of putting the breath in a breath, and neglecting the victim’s tasks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under the Criminal Act include the fact that the defendant has been punished several times for the same kind of crime, the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, the age, sex, conduct, intelligence and environment of the defendant, relationship with the victim, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc. shall be determined as the same as the order, in consideration of the circumstances after the crime, etc.