교통사고처리특례법위반(치사)등
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for two years.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a CM5 vehicle.
1. On December 7, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Death, etc.) (hereinafter referred to as “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”) proceeded with a road of one-lane bus stops in front of the bus stops in the mountain area of the mountain area of the mountain area of the 1-year bus stops.
At night, the Defendant was at night, and the Defendant was behind the victim D (83 ) drive in the same direction, and in such a case, there was a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by reducing speed and checking well the front direction.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded with the Defendant’s negligence in front of the vehicle for the Defendant’s driving SM5 riding, and received the rear part of the above Oral Ba as is.
Ultimately, the Defendant caused the death of the victim by occupational negligence at G hospitals located in Bosan-si F on December 8, 2017, which were treated as detonating caps for treatment.
2. On December 9, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) led the Defendant to proceed in one way among the two-lanes given by the public health clinic at the seat of the police station where the I wedding hall located in H, which is located in the Ha of the Si, in the direction of the police station granting the intersection, along the two-lanes.
Since a crosswalk is installed on the front side, in such a case, there was a duty of care to confirm whether a person engaged in driving service is a person who renders a way to reduce the speed and to see well the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the duty of care to drive safely.
Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting this, the Defendant got the Victim J (70) to stand the crosswalk from the right side of the Defendant’s proceeding to the left side, which was the front part of the MF5 car operated by the Defendant.
As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence during approximately six weeks of medical treatment.