The Defendant is the representative of “C”, who is a comprehensive waste recycling business entity in the Gu and America.

Where wastes are disposed of in breach of the standards for and methods of waste disposal, recycling principles, and matters to be observed, the competent authority shall implement measures to order the disposal of wastes within a specified period.

Nevertheless, on November 22, 2017, the Defendant did not comply with an order issued to dispose of wastes improperly stored, such as waste cables and waste synthetic resin, which were illegally stored within the workplace of the “C” from old and American viewing, a competent authority, until February 23, 2018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Business registration certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation report (Attachment of related case records) (in particular, a copy of the police statement of statement of E, a written decision to suspend the execution of administrative disposition, and a copy

1. Even if a person was punished by a fine for violating Article 65 Subparag. 23, Article 48 Subparag. 1 of the Wastes Control Act, Article 65 Subparag. 23, and Article 48 Subparag. 1 of the Act on the Selection of Criminal Crimes, and Article 65

He is only the representative in the name of the person and did not recognize the mistake, but now his whereabouts became unknown.