폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The sentencing of the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment, and two years of suspended execution) is deemed to be too unhued and unfair.
2. Determination
A. In light of the fact that the instant case is a brick that is a dangerous object of the Defendant’s crime of causing injury to the victim for four weeks of medical treatment, and that the degree of damage to the victim is not less than that of the victim, and that there is no agreement with the victim, it is necessary to strictly punish the Defendant.
B. Meanwhile, there are favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant did not have existed, led to the confession and reflect of the crime, and that the Defendant committed the instant crime in consideration of the motive by deeming that the victim was frighten toward her female-friendly group, and that 2 million won was deposited for the victim.
In addition, considering the Defendant’s age, family relation, living environment, circumstances, results, and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case, the sentence of the lower court is adequate.
3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.