When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. The Defendant filed a complaint against a victim on the ground that the victim B insultingd himself/herself during his/her game, and, on May 24, 2015, had access to the Internet game “D” at the Defendant’s home located in Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, to “The Republic of Korea” and had access to the Defendant’s home located in Young-gu, Young-si, and had been reported by many game participants, and referred to as “D Nung-gu” in the conversation.

(b) The state in which she was accused of her friends

“” posted a letter.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly duplicating facts through information and communication networks with a view to slandering the victim.

2. The Defendant was indicted with summary charge of a fine of KRW 500,000 by insulting himself while the Defendant was playing a game by the victim B. On June 22, 2016, the Defendant connected the Internet game “D” to the Internet game at the Defendant’s office located in Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Seoul on June 22, 2016, and referred to “D” as “D” in the conversation between a large number of game participants reported, and “D Nung-gu, while making a fine of KRW 500,000,00,000,00

B. A notice stating “n” was posted.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly duplicating facts through information and communication networks with a view to slandering the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against the victim;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 70 (1) of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc., and Selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include the motive and circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the age, sexual conduct, environment, etc. of the Defendant. The punishment as set forth in the text of the Criminal Procedure Act shall be determined by taking into account the following factors: