When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 29, 2014, at around 23:30, the Defendant observed that the wife B driven on the road in front of the scambling distance, which is in front of the original city, and was under influence of drinking from the background D, etc. belonging to the Gu and American Police Station C District, and that “scambly and scambly drive,” and he heard from D the words “I am scam and scambly, I am am scam and scambly, I am scam scambly,” and scamd with D’s chest and boat in two hands.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning traffic control and prevention of danger and injury of the above D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In addition to the background, mode, etc. of the crime for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order, the degree of assault is not so significant, D does not want to be punished by the defendant, circumstances favorable to the fact that there is no criminal record, and other circumstances, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, etc., the punishment as ordered, shall be determined in full view of all the circumstances.