However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

From the beginning of 2010, the Defendant was working as a guide or a security officer at D Women's Middle School located in Young City C from early 2010, and the graduates from the above school knew to the victim E (V, 15 years old) who is a child or juvenile.

On April 5, 2017, the Defendant: (a) met the victim who visited the son and the son on April 15, 2017 and visited the above school, and (b) entered the security officer office as well as the son’s office on the right side of the school.

During the division, the victim refers to the victim "Isle one time," and after asking the victim's contact number, the victim refers to the victim "Isle one more time," and the victim "Isle" refers to the victim "Isle only once," and the victim's losses in front of the defendant are replaced by the victim's bucks in front of the defendant while the defendant was seated, and continuously put the victim's losses in front of the victim's buck, and the victim's knick and am am elel was forced by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of cell phones and photographs on-site (No. 13 and No. 15 of the evidence list);

1. Article 7 (3) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse and Article 298 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of the relevant criminal facts;

1. Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (the following sentencing shall be considered in light of the circumstances favorable to the attention) of the mitigated amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (The following sentencing has been repeated for more favorable circumstances);

1. The main sentence of Article 21 (2) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;

1. In light of the proviso of Article 49(1) and the proviso of Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles against Sexual Abuse against Sexual Abuse against children exempted from disclosure order and notification order (the Defendant has no criminal history against the Defendant, and the Defendant has recognized his/her mistake from the investigative agency and is in profoundly against his/her depth, the Defendant’s recidivism is prevented only by taking lectures on the registration of personal information and taking lectures on the treatment of sexual assault.