However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant was found to be a customer on the main points operated by the victim C (V, 59 years of age) and became aware of each other.

On November 17, 2014, at around 23:16, the Defendant reported to the police by the victim of the “E” at the point of the “E operated by the victim, Macheon-gu, Ocheon-gu, Ocheon-gu, Ocheon-gu, operated by the victim, on the ground that the Defendant did not repay the money borrowed by the victim.”

The defendant, after the police officer called for returning home and reported home to the police, destroyed the police officer's re-exploit by using the watch room prepared in advance by finding the victim again, and then damaged the unexploital sirens at the market price attached to the above spawn on the spawn.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes on damage photographs, panss photographs, respective internal reports, and criminal investigation reports;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Act on Suspension of Execution;

1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;