beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.09.19 2014고단1882

자동차관리법위반

Text

Acquittal of the accused shall be acquitted.

Reasons

1. Any person who has taken over an automobile registered as a summary of the facts charged shall apply for the registration of transfer of ownership to the competent Mayor/Do governor within fifteen days after such cause occurs;

Nevertheless, around May 2007, the Defendant paid 4.5 million won in cash to a male on his name in the name of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on a non-speak-dong and did not apply for the registration of transfer of ownership of a motor vehicle within the designated date without justifiable grounds.

2. Based on the reasoning, the prosecutor indicted the above facts charged for a crime falling under Articles 81 subparag. 2 and 12(1) of the Automobile Management Act. According to the above provisions of the Act, the above crime is punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than one year or by a fine not exceeding three million won, and Article 250 of the Criminal Procedure Act, Article 50 of the Criminal Act, and Article 249(1)5 of the former Criminal Procedure Act (amended by Act No. 8730 of Dec. 21, 2007), and Article 249(1)5 of the former Criminal Procedure Act (amended by Act No. 8730 of Dec. 21, 2007). The indictment of this case is clearly recorded on June 26, 2014 when the statute of limitations expires, and thus, the indictment of this case is acquitted pursuant to Article 326 subparag. 3 of the

(A) If a person who acquired a registered motor vehicle is punished by punishment for failing to file an application for ownership transfer registration within the designated date without good cause, the Automobile Management Act was amended by Act No. 9449 of Feb. 6, 2009, and such act was subject to imposition of a fine for negligence until before the transfer, and the facts charged are limited to a case where the above facts charged do not constitute a crime).