However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

In using and managing a means of access, no one shall conduct any act of providing, demanding or promising compensation, except as otherwise expressly provided for in other Acts.

Nevertheless, on March 11, 2019, the Defendant: (a) heard the horses that “the Defendant would make a loan of KRW 6 million by telephone from a name-free person who misrepresented B employees C; (b) received interest at 3% per month is illegal; (c) deposited the principal and interest in the account in the name of the Defendant; and (d) sent a check card so that us may withdraw the principal and interest from the account in the name of the Defendant; and (c) issued one check, the means of access in the name of the Defendant, in front of the E-cafeteria located in Ma-si, 20:17 on the same day.

As a result, the Defendant promised to provide a means of access in return for an intangible expectation interest that can receive future loans, and lent it to a person who has not been named.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of H dialogue (No. 8 on the list of evidence) to a closure photograph;

1. Relevant Article 49(4)2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act and Articles 6(3)2 and 6(3)2 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The sentence of suspended execution under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act shall be determined in full view of the various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the criminal records of the defendant, the nature of the crime of this case, the circumstances before and after the crime of this case, and the reflection of the defendant.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.