beta
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.10.16 2014구단8752

장해급여부지급처분취소

Text

1. The Defendant’s disposition to pay disability benefits to the Plaintiff on March 24, 2014 is revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 2002, the Plaintiff was involved in the accident where the Plaintiff kneeeek knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee on the left side, but there was an obstacle

B. On October 3, 2013, the Plaintiff was at the construction site of the forest road improvement project conducted by the Hongcheon-gun Partnership, and was at the work site of the forest road improvement project, and the Plaintiff was at the time of the accident that knee knee knee kneker kneker in the right kneker, and was at the time of the accident, and was at the time of the injury to the side side side of the right kneker, and was at the time of the medical treatment approval from the Defendant until February 15, 2014.

C. After closing the medical care, the Plaintiff asserted that the degree of the dynamics of the right slot to the Defendant on February 21, 2014, conducted on February 21, 2014, was about 16 meters in the stress interview (Sress Vew) radiation monitoring test, and that the use of the auxiliary device is needed at approximately 14.6 meters in the KT-200 test conducted on February 27, 2014, and claimed disability benefits for the disability of the right slots on the right side.

On March 24, 2014, the Defendant issued a disability benefit payment disposition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that there was a dynamic of 1.3m of e.g., the ET-2000 test, but falls short of the disability payment standard.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 2, 3 through 6 (including virtual number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff's assertion method comparing the dynamics of KT-200 method used by the defendant to assess the plaintiff's right stoves by the plaintiff's right stoves by comparing the dynamics of KT-2000 method of KT-200 method with the dynamics of the remaining stoves of the stoves of the whole stoves of the stoves of the stoves of the stoves of the stoves of the stoves of the stoves of the stoves of the stoves of the stoves of the stoves