except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 20:35 on September 17, 2013, the Defendant driven a BM5 car and proceeded from the front side of the 113-15-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul to the school road in front of the 113-15-dong, Gangnam-gu. At night, at that time, there was an intersection that does not regulate traffic at the front side of the 2nd city, and thus, there was a duty of care to safely enter the intersection to prevent accidents by reducing speed and maintaining the right and the right and the right of the vehicle, and to prevent accidents in advance, the Defendant neglected the duty of care to enter the intersection to prevent accidents. At the same time, the Defendant, while driving a D driving a 52 years old-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, with the victim C (52 years old-gu) who had already entered the intersection to the intersection, did not take necessary measures such as injury to the victim, 20-day passenger 2, 30-day, and 6-day treatment of the 3rd taxi and the right side of the vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to C by the police statement;

1. Statement prepared by E;

1. Statement of the actual survey report;

1. Each description of each written diagnosis and written estimate;

1. Application of each Act or subordinate statute to photograph photographs of an accident vehicle and photographs around the accident site;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Discretionary mitigation Criminal Act;