If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On December 26, 2014, the obstruction of performance of official duties and the Defendant: (a) assaulted E while smoking in front of the D convenience store located in Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, without any justifiable reason, before the D convenience store; (b) and (c) expressed that he assaulted G by a police officer, who is a police officer belonging to the Seoul Daejeon District Police Station F District Unit of the Police Station, and asked G, who is subject to questioning about personal information, of the fact of assaulted by G, who is a police officer belonging to the Daejeon District Police Agency, and asked G, who is subject to questioning of the personal information, “Yek-gu, NA-gu, NA-gu, NA-gu, I will see the victim G (30 years of age), who is going to the front of the troke line of the patrol line, and caused the victim’s injury to the victim, such as a tension and a tension between the victim’s face and the part twice in twice.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch of report 112 by police officers and inflicted injury on G at the same time.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods at the same time, at the same place, and at the same time and place as above, destroyed the utility of KRW 264,00 for the repair cost, such as the between the between the trokes and the between the patrol vehicles, which are public goods, by walking at one time and walking from the patrol vehicles, by walking the strings from the strings to the strings, thereby damaging the repair cost of the strings and the between the trokes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police protocol of statement of I, E, and G;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Written estimates for repair and the application of receipt statutes;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the first sentence of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act is the first half of the reason for sentencing, the fact that the injured police officer found the reason for sentencing, the fact that the injured police officer and deposited it (2 million won), the repair cost due to the damage to public goods, the contingent crime, and the damage are relatively relatively.