2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The parties’ status 1) Defendant H management body (hereinafter “Defendant H management body”) is limited to Defendant H management body

2) The term “instant commercial building” refers to “the instant commercial building” (hereinafter referred to as “instant commercial building”) which is an aggregate building of the first basement and the fifth floor above the ground in Suwon-si J.

The Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings (hereinafter referred to as the “Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings”) for the management thereof.

(2) The Plaintiffs are co-owners of the instant commercial building.

B. On October 4, 2005, the dispute surrounding the management of the commercial building of this case 1) K, who is a pastor and the Plaintiff G, who is his wife, had purchased the commercial building M and operated the New School at the same time. As the problem of the number of the rooftops occurred due to the deterioration of the commercial building, there was a conflict between some sectional owners and lessees who were managing the commercial building of this case under the name of the Nurie and Hhoe Association surrounding the problem.K had been managing the commercial building of this case around July 2008, but the dispute between the former managers and the former managers was eventually brought about as a matter of accounting, management expenses, etc., and the remaining sectional owners and lessees who had been operating in the commercial building of this case before this time and the latter owners and lessees who had been operating in the commercial building of this case 2) and the latter owners and lessees who had been dividing the commercial building of this case into the P Building of this case into the P Building of this case on January 1, 2009 to 10, respectively.

3) Around July 23, 2009, August 21, 2009, August 21, 2009, March 9, 2010, and April 12, 2010, Defendant management body held four managing body meetings on a total of four occasions, and passed a resolution to appoint R as a manager, S in charge, and Defendant I, respectively. 4) Plaintiff B, C, D, E, F, and G.