2. The judgment of the court below is contrary to the facts of the crime committed by the defendants while recognizing the facts of the crime. The crime of this case is acknowledged to have been committed by the defendants, although the defendants sold the rice in 2009 and the rice in 2012, it may cause confusion and incompetence in the 2012. The case is significant; the amount of rice sold by the defendants by falsely marking the production year is not much equivalent to 24 million won in total, 47 million won in total; the defendant Eul's dong Q sold the rice in 2009 and the rice in 2011, while selling it in combination with the rice in 201, the production year was found to have been the first offender; the defendant's imprisonment with prison labor in 2009 and 50 million won in 201, and the defendant's judgment of the court below was not found to have become final and conclusive after being sentenced to various kinds of crimes of this case after being sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and 50 million won in each of this case.

3. In conclusion, since all appeals by the Defendants are without merit, they are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.