However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 25, 2014, at around 21:15, the Defendant: (a) confirmed the personal information of the slope E belonging to the Daegu Southern-gu Police Station Down-gu Police Station Down-gu Police Station, which was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 at the cost of the taxi engineer and fee at the cost of the taxi driver, and (b) assaulted the head of E one time by drinking, i.e., “h. f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 report handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning police statements to E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the conditions favorable to the reasons for sentencing below) of the suspended sentence are divided in depth, and the degree of assault and obstruction of official business is not serious, and there are no criminal records of the same kind or suspension of execution or more, and the reasons for various sentencing indicated in the arguments such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., obstruction of performance of official duties, obstruction of performance of official duties, obstruction of execution of sentence 1, mitigation area (where the degree of assault and intimidation is minor), suspension of sentence 1, mitigation area (where the degree of assault and intimidation is minor), and suspension