However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 27, 2019, the Defendant, at an entertainment drinking house “C” located in Seosan City B, around 22:24, on the ground that the victim was flicking with D(37 years of age) on the ground that the victim was flicking with D, the Defendant used an empty beer, which is a dangerous article on the table, and assessed the face of the victim, and thereby, assessed the face of the victim three times in total by putting the beer disease back on an empty beer and citing the face of the victim. On the hand, the Defendant continuously assessed the face of the victim by using the beer disease at a price of the beer’s face, and caused the victim’s injury, such as the inside and outside of the number of days of treatment, by continuing to do so one time with the hand of the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant carried a beer, which is a dangerous thing, and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to injury diagnosis certificates and photographs;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Suspension of execution is highly dangerous in light of the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the means of crime and the degree of damage, etc., and the injury suffered by the victim is not easy.

However, it is against the defendant's wrong recognition, and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant by agreement with the victim.

Other conditions of punishment, such as the age, character and conduct, environment, criminal records, etc. of defendants, shall be determined as per the disposition.