However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of the Lone Star Co., Ltd.

On July 20, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on July 23:25, 2014, and driven the front road of the current audit distance in the Jindong-gu, Busan, according to the one-lane distance from the front of the current audit distance.

At the time, the victim C(22 years old) driver's D's car stops in the signal atmosphere at the front of the defendant's driving direction. In such a case, the defendant, who is engaged in the driving duty, has a duty of care to operate the brake by accurately operating the brake system by checking the front side well.

그럼에도 피고인은 이를 게을리 한 채 그대로 진행하여 피고인이 운전하는 위 스타렉스 승합차의 앞부분으로 피해자 C가 운전하는 위 소나타 차량의 뒷부분을 들이받고, 이 충격으로 위 소나타 차량이 전방으로 튕기면서 신호대기 중인 피해자 E(59세)가 운전하는 F 소나타 택시 뒷부분을 재차 들이받게 되었다.

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim C, E, and taxi passengers G (the 29-year-old passengers), such as climatic salt, etc. requiring medical treatment for about two weeks, and, at the same time, did not immediately stop the said damaged vehicles so that the 3,086,398 won, including the exchange of clifers, can come back without taking measures such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of C and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on photographs of the vehicle involved in an accident, a written diagnosis, a quotation, or a visual recording of the accident;

1. Relevant Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime (the occupation of any measure not taken after the accident);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of penalty;