A. The facts of recognition 1) D Co., Ltd., Ltd., Inc., on March 24, 2012, 200:10:0:0:0,000, and as shown in the attached Form No. 1, the FF vehicle over two lanes and three lanes on the three-lane road of the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E apartment (hereinafter “Defendant

2) The Plaintiff neglected to perform his duty of care to drive safely by taking into account the front section and the left and right while driving his vehicle within a speed of 21 to 30 kilometers per hour, and caused the Plaintiff who was on the two-lanes in the front section in drinking condition (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) As a result, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the Plaintiff’s upper left-hand skes, etc. (2) The Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement with the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, Eul 4 (each number is included; hereinafter the same shall apply), Gap 5 video, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damages caused by the accident in this case as a mutual aid business operator of defendant vehicle.

C. In light of the developments leading up to the instant accident, the injury of the Plaintiff, and the degree of liability, the Plaintiff’s negligence is deemed 50%.

Therefore, the defendant's liability ratio is limited to 50% of total amount of damages.

2. In addition to the following separate statements within the scope of the liability for damages, the items in the following table of the liability for damages shall be as follows, and in principle, the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.

[Ground of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap 2, 4, 8, Eul 1 through 9, the results of each physical appraisal commission to the president of G Hospital in this Court, the results of fact inquiry, significant facts, experience and the purport of the whole pleadings

(a) lost income;