공무집행방해등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.
Punishment of the crime
【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On November 12, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of obstructing the performance of official duties in the Seo-gu District Court Branch of the Seo-gu District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 20, 2015.
[Criminal Facts]
1. On August 18, 2016, from around 01:30 on the same day to around 02:10 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) demanded the victim from “G Singing practice hall” in the “Ginging practice hall” operated by the Daegu Seo-gu Office E; (b) however, the victim was “the time during which the business is completed.”
When refusing the defendant's request, "the victim has been in school due to why he or she was why he or she was in school."
Whether he knows who is within the military; or
“I,” and “I, in case of the defect that I wish to use a toilet by a male guest who is not his name, I am to the customer.”
The author expressed his desire as the “Sero gue”, and fighted with franchis of the above male customers, and obstructed the victim’s singing practice room business by force by avoiding the disturbance for 40 minutes, and allowing customers to play singing practice in front of the singing practice room.
2. Around 02:00 on August 18, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, on the ground that: (a) the circumstances leading up to the Daegu-gu Police Station H District of the Police Station, called upon receipt of a report from 112 that the customer would be disturbed, demanded that I confirm the damage and inform the Defendant of the personal information; and (b) the Defendant would be bad.
“I, by hand, have pushed the chest of the above police officer one time,” and the above police officer may be arrested against the defendant “if the police officer acted, he may interfere with the execution of official duties.”
“ Even though several warnings were given, the chest of the police officer was tightly pushed down one time by hand, and continued assaulted twice by the chest of the police officer, which interfered with the police officer’s legitimate execution of his duties concerning the maintenance of public order and criminal investigation.
(i) the evidence;