성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds of appeal. 2. The judgment of this court is unfair in depth, and the defendant seems to be in need of mental therapy (pharmacologic treatment and cognitive behavioral treatment). However, even though the defendant had been punished for a sex offense several times, the defendant committed each of the crimes in this case during the period of suspension of execution despite the fact that the defendant had been punished for a sex offense, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments of this case, such as physical parts and number of photographs, the defendant's age, character and behavior, family character, family character, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances before and after the crime, it is difficult to view that the sentence of imprisonment of six months imposed by the court of first instance is too unfair. Thus, the defendant's above assertion about this point is not acceptable.
3. Accordingly, we cannot accept the Defendant’s appeal under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.