도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
"2015 Highest 2030"
1. On May 27, 2014, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Busan District Court. On August 4, 2014, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for the same crime, etc. on two or more occasions, despite the fact that the Defendant had a record of drinking on two or more occasions, on December 19, 2014, from the front day of the Dob Borrowing located in the father-dong, Busan District Court to the front day of the 500-meter-dong, Busan District, Busan District Court without obtaining the driver’s license from approximately 500 meters to the front day of the Gabbridge in the front day of the 681, to the Busan District Court, the Defendant driven the 49c oboon in the state of drinking alcohol concentration of KRW 0.121% under the influence of alcohol.
2. The Defendant violating the Road Traffic Act is a person engaged in driving service.
At the time and time stated in paragraph (1), the defendant proceeded along one lane from the road front of the camping bridge located in 681, as Busan, Busan, Jin-gu.
At the time, there were nights, and there was a signal waiting vehicle in the front door, so the person engaged in driving a motorcycle has a duty of care to see the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the duty to drive.
Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting the duty of the front left-hand turn turn-hand turn-hand turn-on vehicle at the victim B, which was under the right-hand turn-on signal at one lane, and received the front part of the front part of the lower part.
Ultimately, the Defendant damaged the above vehicle owned by the victim by the above negligence in order to cover KRW 460,00.
3. A person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall not operate an automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance, but the Defendant operated the automobile as described in paragraph 1 at the time and place specified in paragraph 1.