If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On November 3, 2013, at around 23:50, the Defendant was urged by the police officer F of the Gwangju Northern Police Station E district unit, who was dispatched upon receipt of a report, to “re-examine whether there is locking in a bank or clothes” from the police officer F of the Seoul Northern Police Station E district unit, who was dispatched, to the Defendant. The Defendant expressed, without any reason, the said police officer’s desire to read, “this farce, farce, this farcing,” and farced the above police officer’s title, farced and farced by hand, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of his duties concerning the maintenance of public order and criminal investigation by using the farced hand of the police officer G belonging to the E district, who was removed from this next.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol to G and F

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;