The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the facts charged in this case was guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

There is no violation of law by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation against logical and empirical rules by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations as alleged in the grounds of appeal, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the legal nature of the allowance for long-term repair of multi-family housing or the determination of whether the custodian has an intention to acquire unlawful acquisition in embezzlement.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.