beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.14 2013가합546542

부당이득금반환 등

Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. Of KRW 29,576,300 and its attached Form 1 “net No.” column 1 to 1.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

가. 피고는 1965. 12.경 파주시 B 임야 23,306㎡(이하 ‘이 사건 토지’라 한다) 중 별지 3 도면 표시 30, 31, 32, 33, 30의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 ㉵부분 37㎡에 송전철탑(이하 ‘이 사건 송전철탑’이라 한다)을 설치하여 현재까지 관리하고 있는데, 이 사건 송전철탑이 세워진 부지의 면적은 지하에 매설된 기초콘크리트까지 고려하면 50㎡이다.

나. 위 송전철탑으로부터 나온 154kV의 신덕은-수색 고압가공 송전선(이하 ‘이 사건 송전선’이라 한다)이 위 설치 무렵부터 이 사건 토지 중 별지 3 도면 표시 23, 24, 29, 40, 39, 34, 23의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 ㉱부분 2,241㎡ 감정인 C의 측량감정 결과에 의하면, 위 ㉱부분의 면적 중 위 ㉵부분의 지상 면적 37㎡를 제외한 나머지 면적이 2,204㎡이므로, 위 ㉱부분 전체의 면적은 2,241㎡이다.

It goes over the airspace.

C. The Plaintiff inherited the instant land after the power transmission tower and the power transmission line were installed.

On September 14, 2006, the Plaintiff filed a civil petition demanding the Defendant to pay compensation for the use of the instant land without permission, and the Defendant submitted to the Plaintiff that “The instant transmission tower and transmission line were constructed upon consultation with the landowner at the time of construction on September 25, 2006, although it is presumed that the instant transmission tower and transmission line had been constructed upon consultation with the landowner at the time of construction on September 25, 2006, it cannot be confirmed that the details of compensation, etc. up to now, the Plaintiff selected multiple appraisal institutions to implement compensation after evaluating the usage fee.”

E. On October 19, 2006 and November 3, 2006, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to pay a compensation of 18.6 billion won, and filed a civil petition demanding the undergroundization of the power transmission line of this case. The Defendant set the compensation in accordance with the standards for daily response and notified the Plaintiff thereof. On the other hand, the power transmission tower of this case and the power transmission tower of this case.