However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On December 18, 2013, the Defendant: (a) conspireds to forge and use his/her name omitted and official document-related resident registration certificate; and (b) on December 18, 2013, in the new forest station located in the new forest zone located in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant’s photograph was replaced by C’s photograph on his/her resident registration certificate issued on April 14, 2008 by the Gyeonggi-do Bupyeong-si market replacing C’s photograph with his/her photograph.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the person who was not a name, forged a resident registration certificate for C in the name of the Bupyeong-do Busan Metropolitan City, which is an official document for the purpose of exercising.

2. Around December 24, 2013, the Defendant drafted an application for the establishment of a mobile phone at the E store located in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, and exercised the forged official document by suggesting that F, who is aware of the forgery, actually issued a forged resident registration certificate as prescribed in paragraph (1), was the same as that of paragraph (1).

3. The Defendant forged a private document at the time, time, and place under Paragraph 2, stated in the application form for joining the said E store in the purchaser, deposit owner, and subscriber column “C” and “G” in the resident registration number column, and signed on the name next to C.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged two copies of private documents concerning C's rights and duties.

4. The Defendant: (a) presented to F, who was aware of the forgery at the time and place specified in paragraph (2), two copies of the forged application form, as stated in paragraph (3), to F, which is the cause of the occupation of cellular phone store; and (b) exercised it.

5. The Defendant attempted to take advantage of the forged resident registration certificate, such as Paragraph 2, at the time and place of paragraph 2, and Paragraph 1, to take advantage of the forged resident registration certificate, thereby deceiving F of the above store employees as if he was C, and to take over 2,140,000 won of the total market value of Victim H, which is the possession of the victim H, which is the store store from F, by deceiving 32 of the total market value of the victim H.