교통사고처리특례법위반
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the hurdy driving of the New Zealand.
On February 21, 2016, the Defendant, at around 21:05, operated the said new-based car, and came to turn to the left at the seat of the Cheongju-ju from the Cheongju-gu Office, the 231st Cheongju-gu Office, as the Cheongju-gu Office was located.
Since there is a distance from which a signal, etc. is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by proceeding in accordance with the new code.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left in contravention of the signal and caused the above Oral Ba to go to the right part of the victim C(46C) driver's left-hand part of the victim C(46C) driver's driving, who was directly in front of the right-hand part of the vehicle of the Aburg-purg.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, i.e., an injury to the victim, i.e., an external wound, which requires approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against C and the accused;
1. A survey report on actual condition and photographs on the scene of accidents;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a medical certificate and a report on investigation (whether hospitalized or not and the treatment period is confirmed);
1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;
1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the fact that the defendant is divided and is covered by a comprehensive insurance, and that the defendant has been employed and has been living in Korea for about four years as a Chinese, and that he seems to have living relatively faithfully without any criminal history).