However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 15, 2017, at around 00:17, the Defendant: (a) moved in a D bus parked on the front of the “C cafeteria” way in Guro-gu Seoul, Seoul; (b) expressed that the police officer F of the police box affiliated with the police box of the Guro Police Station E, who called the Defendant at the request of the bus article for the purpose of unleashing the passengers; and (c) took a desire for the Defendant to stop this, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the prevention and patrol of the crime, such as walking in the bus by a bus by the Hagu Police Station E, who was called out upon the request of the bus article.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and H:

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the I;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;