2. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the degree of damage suffered by the victim in the instant case; (b) the attitude shown by the Defendant in relation to the victim; and (c) the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment; (d) the background and consequence of the instant crime; and (e) the circumstances of sentencing as shown in the records and pleadings, such as the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court, which reduced a fine of one million won by half of the summary order, is appropriate, and is not too unreasonable, considering that agreement with the victim B was reached.

3. According to the conclusion, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, on the grounds that the Defendant’s appeal is without merit (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200Da36424, Apr. 2, 200). It is so decided as per Disposition (see, e.g., Supreme Court en banc Decision 2006Da36444, Apr