출입국관리법위반
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.
Punishment of the crime
No person shall employ any foreigner who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.
From May 20, 2019 to May 27, 2019, the Defendant employed five foreigners who did not have the status of sojourn eligible to engage in job-seeking activities as indicated in the following table, such as C, etc., who is a solar state for eligibility for visa exemption (B-1) that does not engage in job-seeking activities.
No. 1 CD-1 (Visa exemption) wage at the place of work for the period of illegal employment of nationality on May 20, 2019 through May 27, 2019 at the place of work for the period of monthly stay of nationality of the year, the name of 70,000 won per day for B B B B-1 (Visa exemption) in Nam-gun, Namnam-gun, the number of days from May 20, 2019 to May 27, 2019, B-1 (Visa exemption) at the 70,000 won per day for B-1 (Visa exemption) in Thai-gun, the number of days from May 20, 2019 to May 27, 2019, B-1 (Visa exemption) at the 70,000,000 won per day for B-J, the 70,000,000 won per day for B-J, the number of days from May 20, 2019.
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Legal statement of the witness M;
1. A certificate of foreign employment;
1. The Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the Defendant’s report on activities regulating immigration offenders and written notice of decision on examining and deciding immigration offenders [the Defendant and his defense counsel claimed that five or more foreigners employed by the Defendant are not only five or more days, and that five or more foreigners employed by the Defendant work at the immigration control office was confirmed at a general level, and that the Defendant was found not to have claimed that the Defendant was employed in the form of his own pen, and that the Defendant, who was discovered, made a written confirmation of employment by his own pen, and the Defendant did not claim that he was employed by himself. The Defendant written a written confirmation of foreign employment (Evidence No. 5 of Evidence No. 5 of the above foreigners), along with his personal information, clearly stated the period of employment, payment remuneration, and work.