정보비공개결정 등 취소
1. The Defendant’s decision to disclose information to the Plaintiff on November 9, 2016 is revoked.
2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.
Details of the disposition
On July 11, 2016, the Plaintiff was dismissed from office by the head of the Daejeon Regional Labor Relations Commission on September 29, 2016, on the ground that C’s “2015 C” was wasted by using expenses incurred in exercising the workshop without conducting the work as a team leader, B, etc. (hereinafter “B”), which was a foundation corporation B, (hereinafter “C”), etc. (hereinafter “C”). On December 19, 2016, the Plaintiff dissatisfied with the request and filed an application for remedy against the Plaintiff on September 29, 2016, and the Chungcheongnamnam Regional Labor Relations Commission rejected the application for review to the National Labor Relations Commission on the ground that the dismissal of the Plaintiff was unfair dismissal. On April 4, 2017, the National Labor Relations Commission rejected the application for review on the initial plan to revoke the instant ruling on retrial on May 19, 2017 (Seoul District Court’s early report to the Director of the Daejeon Regional Labor Relations Commission and the Plaintiff did not seek for revocation of the foregoing ruling on May 19, 2017, 201.
1. The referral questions by the Board of Audit and Inspection classified and implemented by the document production institution as non-disclosure, and the matters concerning individuals according to the information subject to non-disclosure under Article 9 (1) 6 of the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”) are non-disclosure;
2. Information subject to non-disclosure, the document, etc. produced during investigation activities, such as evidentiary documents, request for disposition, etc. collected by an Inspector General in accordance with the detailed standards for information subject to non-disclosure at the time of the Republic of Korea under the Information Disclosure Act, and documents produced during investigation activities, etc.
3. On October 1, 2016, the Plaintiff, who has no record of the current status, is the Defendant B.