The sentencing of the lower court (a fine of 4 million won) is too unhued and unfair.

Judgment

Even before the crime of this case was committed, the Defendant did not reflect the fact that he committed the crime of this case even though he had been punished once before the crime of this case, but committed the crime of this case. However, the Defendant’s confession and reflects all of the crimes of this case, the Defendant appears to be healthy due to urology, etc., the size of the credit business operated by the Defendant is relatively small, and there is no record of criminal punishment for a total of twice, but there is no record of criminal punishment for a total of two occasions, and there is no record of criminal punishment for a suspended sentence or higher, taking into account the motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime of this case, Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, etc., and other various circumstances, which are the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case,

In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.