beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2013.10.02 2013고합128

아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강제추행)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant is serving as a taxi driver in the same taxi company as the parent of the victim C (V, 17 years of age).

1. At around 09:40 on May 11, 2013, the Defendant was driving the victim before the victim’s house located in Bosung-gun, Bosung-gun, with a customer, up to the F Station located in E, and was taking charge of the victim’s boat that he was seated by her hand, and the Defendant’s defect that she would not make the victim her. The Defendant continued to look at the victim’s boat, and committed an indecent act by force against the victim, who is a child or juvenile.

2. At around 23:00 on the same day, the Defendant was driving the taxi platform of the F Station Squae-gun E with the victim's seat as a customer, and the Defendant took charge of the victim's boat seated with the victim's seat, taken the victim's hand into the victim's seat, knife the victim's knife, knife the victim's knife, knife the victim's knife, knife the victim's knife, knife the victim's knife, knife the victim's knife, knife the victim's knife, knife, knife the victim's finger, and knife the victim's chest, and forced the victim to commit an indecent act by force the victim's chest.

Summary of Evidence

Defendant’s partial statement

Judgment on the defendant's assertion of stenographic records investigation report (to hear victim's statement)

1. As to the facts constituting the crime of Paragraph 2 of the argument, the defendant only elbows in driving contact the body of the victim and did not interfere with the victim's body.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence adopted and examined by this court, including the evidence mentioned above, the victim is as set forth in paragraph 2 of this judgment.