특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(증재등)
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. A violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes) received a request from a construction business entity C to implement a loan with a “six parcels of land, such as D previously D 353 square meters, etc.,” which had been offered by a construction business entity C around December 2, 2014 and received a total of KRW 90,70,000 from that time to February 5, 2016, as indicated in the attached Table 1 through 6 and 8 of the List of Crimes, from that time, the Defendant was transferred KRW 20,000,000 from that time to February 5, 2016.
After all, the Defendant received KRW 90,700,000 from financial companies to arrange matters related to the duties of executive officers and employees.
2. The violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Additional Economic Crimes, etc.) is an executive officer or employee of the Songpa Agricultural Cooperative located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as the "Saf Agricultural Cooperative") at the H branch from February 2009 to February 2014, the Vice-head and team leader of the Eaf Agricultural Cooperative located in the same Gu (hereinafter referred to as the "Saf Agricultural Cooperative"), from February 2014 to March 2015, and from March 2015 to February 17, 2016, the head of the Eaf Agricultural Cooperative J branch located in the same Gu (hereinafter referred to as the "Saf Agricultural Cooperative"), who works as the head of the Eaf Agricultural Cooperative branch located in the same Gu (hereinafter referred to as the "Saf Agricultural Cooperative"), who was in charge of the affairs such as credit, etc.
On December 2014, the Defendant issued a request from F to F for a loan that “the items requested to enter the front payment shall be left to F, and the loan interest rate of 30 to 40% out of the fee that the client received from F is lower than the maximum, and the amount of the loan will be set as much as possible.” In the future, the Defendant issued a request from the SC Bank Account (O) in the name of the Defendant and paid the fee by deposit in the above account, etc.
As a result, the defendant around December 2014.