2. Determination is an element of sentencing favorable to the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects it, that the Defendant paid all the amount of damage to the victims, that the amount of damage is not very significant, and that the mother of the Defendant is willing to guide the victims not to repeat the crime in the future.

However, the crime of this case is a crime against many unspecified persons who pretended to sell used goods through the Internet, and acquired proceeds through the Internet, and has a significant threat, such as undermining social trust in transactions through the Internet, and even if the defendant had already been subjected to the suspended execution due to fraud under similar veterinary laws, he/she again committed the crime of this case during the suspended execution period, and other factors of sentencing disadvantageous to the defendant, and other factors of sentencing that are shown in the records of this case, the sentence of the court below against the defendant is appropriate.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.