관리비
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff is the sectional owner of the 38 stores in the Cheongju-si, the reasonable Gu Cheongju-si, the commercial building in this case is maintained and managed. The defendant, as the sectional owner of the 17 shop in the 17 shop in this case, agreed to pay 100,000 won per annum to the plaintiff as the remuneration and management expenses for the 17 shop in this case, and the plaintiff has the duty to pay 10,200,000 won (6 years (6 years to 2012) x 17 stores per annum x 100,000 won per annum) and the defendant's share as the remuneration and management expenses for the commercial building in this case, and the plaintiff has the duty to pay 10,000,000 won per annum as the total amount of the inspection expenses for the maintenance and management of the building in 2014 and 300,000 won per annum and delay damages.
2. Each statement of documentary evidence submitted by the Plaintiff and the testimony made by the witness D of this court alone are not enough to acknowledge that the Defendant agreed to pay the Plaintiff KRW 100,000 per annum with the repair and management expenses per store. The Defendant’s electrical safety inspection expenses to be borne by the Defendant in 2014 are KRW 100,000,000, the inspection expenses for the building maintenance in 2014, the inspection expenses for the building maintenance in 2016 are KRW 300,00,000, and the expenses for the building maintenance and management in 2016 are 30,000,000,000 won due to the Plaintiff’s repair and management, and there is no evidence to prove otherwise.
Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is not accepted.
3. The judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.