특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant is a person engaged in driving cars for BM5 in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving).
On December 27, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol on December 27, 2016, and driven the said car at a speed of about 40km in speed, according to the two-lane distance distance near D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
At night, there was a vehicle waiting to signal to the front by using a remote distance, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the front door and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver.
Nevertheless, as such, while neglecting this, the victim E (39) who was waiting for a signal to the left-hand side of the said vehicle while under the influence of alcohol making it difficult to drive the vehicle normally and was behind the right-hand side of the cargo vehicle.
Ultimately, the Defendant driven under such influence of alcohol as above, resulting in the Defendant’s injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of a medical treatment for about two weeks, and suffered injury to the victim G (the age of 39) who was accompanied by the said cargo for about two weeks, such as chills, tensions, etc.
2. A defendant who violated the Traffic Act on December 27, 2016, driving a motor vehicle while drunkly under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking and smelling on the face from the police officer I belonging to the said district while investigating the traffic accident at the H District located in the same Gu on December 27, 2016.
Due to reasonable grounds, there was a demand for responding to the measurement of drinking in a manner that puts the breag into a drinking measuring instrument over about 30 minutes.
Nevertheless, the defendant has avoided it and without any justifiable reason.