도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Criminal facts
On January 12, 2001, the defendant issued a summary order of 700,000 won as a fine for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Busan District Court on August 12, 2001, a summary order of 2 million won as a fine for the same crime at the same court on August 10, 2004, and the same court on February 28, 2005 issued a summary order of 2 million won as a fine for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (dacting) and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (dacting) at the Changwon District Court on September 30, 201, and received a summary order of 3 million won as a fine for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (dacting).
1. On February 13, 2016, the Defendant driving a vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.062% while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.062% in blood without obtaining a driver’s license from the front line of a main line where it is impossible to identify the trade name located in the Dong-dong of Busan on the road at around 04:30 on February 13, 2016.
2. On February 13, 2016, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) around 04:40, the Defendant issued a resident registration number “F” of E’s resident registration number, where the name of Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong-dong was sent by D, who was requested to verify his identity on the roads of the Dong Kimhae-dong, Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si Police Station C District Police Station in the mid-gu Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si, and for the purpose of evading criminal punishment.
3. The Defendant, at the time, place, and place stated in paragraph 2, entered the details of drinking control, such as date, time, place, and alcohol concentration in blood, into a portable information device (PDA) and demanded the Defendant to sign it electronically. Accordingly, D, who is aware of the forgery, sent the aforementioned portable information device to the police network.
Accordingly, the defendant forged E's signature and exercised it for the purpose of exercising it.
4. The Defendant who forged a private document or carried out a falsified investigation document shall enter the details of the statement report on the situation of the driver who was taken from D at the time, place, and place set forth in paragraph 2.